Alexis de Tocqueville was a French sociologist and a political theorist. He grew up in France, however, traveled to America to study the prison system and returned to France with a broader knowledge and observation from the United States. He condensed his finding in a book called “Democracy in America,” which he published in 1835. In the book, he showed how he admired the individualism and the stability of the economy, yet questioned its embrace of slavery and treatment of Native Americans. Chapter
Certainly Alexis’ experience with the Social equality those minorities faced, during his visit, was viewed as incompatible with democracy. Neither of the French visitors agreed with the treatment of slaves or the Native Americans, and Alexis was able to document this in his books. The view Tocqueville had of the Anglo European view towards Natives and Blacks was as “human beings are to animals” (Alexis de Tocqueville 92). In a way Tocqueville predicted what ended up happening, and that Anglo Europeans
The Consideration of Democracy, Blacks, and Slavery Tocqueville, in Democracy in America, dwells on the strengths and weaknesses of American democracy. When discussing race relations, he recognizes that the presence of the black race in America and the occupation of blacks in slavery could threaten the continuation of the United States as a Union and a republic. As a Union, the United States could be torn apart by the disparities between the North and the South and tensions between blacks and whites
In Democracy in America, Alexis de Tocqueville is highly congratulatory towards American embodiment of religion, specifically Christianity. In his section on the indirect influence of religion on American politics, he speaks positively of the enormous influence Christian morality maintains in America over the “souls of men” (de Tocqueville 388). In this essay, I will attempt to answer the questions brought forth by de Tocqueville, by examining his own work and evaluating it through the eyes of two
French writer, Alexis de Tocqueville, examines democratic revolutions where he describes his opinions about what occurred over the past seven hundred years. One of Tocqueville’s greatest pieces of literature is that of Democracy in America. Before we look deeper into Tocqueville’s two-volume study, we must learn some background information about this man and the things he has done in order to gain the knowledge to write such an impactful political book. Tocqueville was raised in an aristocratic
2014; Alexis De Tocqueville was casually heading down to the local election hall in Toronto for the municipal elections occurring that night. As he stepped in and stood in line for his turn, he noticed two individuals ahead of him. At closer inspection, he was in awe to realize these two gentlemen happened to be Adam Smith and Karl Marx, two great philosophers he had always wanted to meet and converse with. Smith and Marx, realizing their admirer staring, immediately recognized Tocqueville as well
Alexis de Tocqueville’s Influence Alexis de Tocqueville’s observation of the American prison system brought out several interesting facts about America and how it governs itself. He talks of the danger of greed for money, the importance of forming associations, and the power of influence in town government. Although many of his observations have since changed, many of them bring about legitimate points about American government and society. In
Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America is a 1835 masterpiece about the growth of democracy and the gradual disappearance of aristocracy. In attempts to help the French understand the concept about this new form of government, he wrote the document talking about the New World where the people rule instead of the nobles and kings. Two main differentiations are discussed: selfishness versus individualism and aristocracy versus democracy. The first idea that he compares is selfishness and individualism
When the French aristocrat Alexis de Tocqueville sets foot in the New World in May 1831, he believes he already knows what he will find. Searching for solid political structures after having been shaken by revolutions, he is convinced that the future of Europe lies in democratic America. On his nine-month journey, Tocqueville seeks to confirm his intuition that the entire Christian world is heading into the political modern age. America no longer is playing the role of the straggler who tries
Both Adam Smith and Alexis de Tocqueville agree that an individual is the most qualified to make decisions affecting the sphere of the individual as long as those decisions do not violate the law of justice. >From this starting point, each theorist proposes a role of government and comments on human nature and civil society. Smith focuses on economic liberty and the ways in which government can repress this liberty, to the detriment of society. De Tocqueville emphasizes political liberty and